thesalt reviews & complains 2023; is it legit or scam?

An In-Depth Look at Earn Money Platform presents itself as an online influencer marketing platform that allows South African users to earn money by promoting brand campaigns. In this detailed review, I’ll examine’s features, payment proofs, legitimacy concerns, and more to help potential users determine if it’s a genuine opportunity.

Overview of

According to the review on Tunnelgist, is owned and operated by The Salt, an initiative of leading South African media group Nfinity. The site aims to connect users’ lifestyles with prominent brands by having them participate in selected marketing campaigns.

As an influencer marketing platform,’s concept is to pay users for promoting sponsored content to their social networks. The review claims users could earn up to R3000 ($168 USD) per month, though specific payout rates are unclear. Eligibility is currently limited to South African residents. Features

The review provides a basic overview of’s features and operation:

  • Users sign up and are selected for marketing campaigns from various brands
  • Promoting sponsored content on your social networks is the main way to earn rewards
  • A referral program offers bonuses for new signups from an existing user’s link
  • Earnings can be withdrawn to a linked bank account once a payment threshold is met

However, no in-depth details are given on the types of campaigns, payment structures, or how often users can expect to be selected. The lack of transparency leaves many aspects uncertain.

Is Legitimate?

While shares contact details and company information checking out, other signs cause some legitimacy concerns:

  • No official social profiles were found to independently verify the platform
  • Only a stock image is used as supposed “payment proof” with censored details
  • Reviews provide minimal proof of real users actually earning as advertised
  • Common scam red flags like grammatical errors are present on the site
  • stronger competitors like seem to offer more transparency

Read is rentoza legit or scam? Rentoza reviews & complains 2023

is yandy legit or scam company? reviews & complains 2023 reviews & complains 2023; contact and overview

is dt trading legit or scam? Dt trading Employees reviews 2023

Alternatives to

Given the uncertainty, it may be safer for potential users to consider more established influencer marketing platforms in South Africa:

  • is a prominent local marketplace connecting brands to influencers. It has thousands of reviews showing real payouts.
  • Ysense offers international opportunities to complete paid surveys and tasks if eligible. It has a strong reputation among online earnings sites.
  • Swagbucks also pays users worldwide for things like surveys, shopping, and playing games. It has built a large loyal community through transparency.

The alternatives show more upfront reliability through proven track records, compared to which remains relatively untested and opaque in disclosures. User Experience

Another area where lacks is user reviews and feedback. No firsthand accounts could be found regarding:

  • The application and selection process for campaigns
  • How involved or time-consuming promoted content is expected to be
  • Response times and reliability of support if issues do occur
  • Actual payout rates, schedules, and payment processing durations

Without social evidence, potential users have no means to gauge the real effort vs. reward tradeoffs they may face. This lack of user-generated content significantly reduces transparency.

In Summary

To conclude, while presents an interesting influencer marketing opportunity in concept, its review raises several concerns that increase risk for users:

  • Minimal proof is given that the platform operates legitimately as described
  • Stronger foreign and local competitors offer more transparency and reviews
  • Important operational details are omitted or uncertain from the provided review
  • An absence of user reviews leaves many unanswered questions unanswered

For these reasons, other established platforms may represent lower-risk choices until demonstrates increased disclosure, legitimacy verification from independent sources, and gains social evidence from real users to back its value proposition. Safety should take priority over potential rewards where financial landscapes remain foggy. Frequently Asked Questions

Here are answers to some common questions about based on the information given:

How do the campaigns work?

Few specifics are provided, but it seems users are selected to promote sponsored brand content via their existing social networks. The types of content and required efforts are unclear.

How/when will I get paid?

The review claims earnings must meet a threshold before withdrawal, but payout amounts, structures, schedules and processing times are not verifiably disclosed.

What if I don’t get selected for campaigns?

The likelihood or frequency of selection is uncertain based on the information given. It’s unknown if alternative earning options exist if no campaigns are offered.

Is the platform safe to use?

Some legitimacy concerns are raised due to minimal verified proof and opaque disclosures. Safer alternatives seem available until offers clearer assurances.

What country can join?

Currently, only South African residents are eligible, though this may change if the platform expands internationally. – Evaluation and Recommendation

In summary, while presents a novel opportunity in concept, its review raises valid points that increase uncertainty and risks for potential users:

  • Lack of transparency leaves important aspects uncertain or unverified
  • No user reviews means experiences cannot be independently confirmed
  • More established competitors offer stronger track records and proofs
  • Safety should take priority over potential rewards with financial platforms

For these reasons, unless and until significantly improves disclosures with verified information, it remains difficult to confidently recommend the platform based on the review. New users may find more reliably transparent alternatives represent lower risks worth considering first. Continued development with transparency over time could help build needed credibility going forward.



In conclusion, while the idea behind is interesting, its limited review raises too many unanswered questions. More vetted opportunities currently exist that allow users to proceed with greater confidence based on independent proofs. Prudence suggests exploring safer options first until greater clarity and trust can be established. Transparency eliminates uncertainty, which is paramount for platforms involving personal finances.

While the concept behind of earning money through influencer marketing campaigns is certainly appealing, the review of the platform published on Tunnelgist raises some valid concerns that increase the risk profile for potential new users. Chief among these is a troubling lack of transparency and independently verifiable details about important aspects of how actually works.

From eligibility requirements and user selection processes, to payment structures, schedules and amounts, many operational particulars are either omitted entirely or presented with scant supporting evidence from the platform itself. Even basics like the types of sponsored content campaigns users might expect are shrouded in uncertainty based on the information provided. This dearth of clear disclosures leaves far too many unanswered questions for new users exploring an opportunity involving their personal social media profiles and finances.

Compounding these issues is a complete absence of firsthand user reviews or experiences that could help paint a more well-rounded picture. Independent perspectives are invaluable for gauging realistic expectations around effort commitments, reliability, support quality and value perception over time in practice. But with no social evidence found, remains an unknown quantity in terms of real-world user satisfaction and tradeoffs.

Perhaps most concerning is the review’s identification of some legitimate signs that call the platform’s authenticity into question. From grammatical inconsistencies to a lack of verified contactability and payment proofs shown, certain details align with common deceptive tendencies and don’t inspire confidence that user interests would be protected. While not definitive on their own, these red flags taken with other transparency gaps only serve to increase perceived risks.

In comparison, more robustly established South African and global influencer marketing platforms showcase a clear advantage through openly published reviews, case studies, rigorous disclosure policies and dedicated help networks over extended periods. This visible track record building engenders the kind of trust newer ventures have yet to earn from the start through demonstrated accountability, responsiveness and commitment to community values.

Unless and until works diligently to match industry standards of visibility with its own operations and policies, uncertainty brought on by limited transparency will persist as a significant barrier to confident recommendation. While innovation should always be encouraged, protecting users necessitates priority focus on eliminating unknowns, not maintaining them for prospective members exploring income opportunities.

For these reasons, based on the review examined, more transparent marketplace alternatives offering social substantiation and proven reliability seem to represent lower-risk propositions for anyone seeking clear expectations upfront. Safer choices abound until takes initiative to independently verify features, address concerns raised, showcase real user engagement over time and establish a record of stewardship through commitment to open disclosure like successful platforms exemplify.

In the end, any financial undertaking requires judicious consideration of what’s certain versus speculative. The onus falls to each venture to earn public assurance through visible accountability, not assumptions of prospective outcomes still unconfirmed. For, further progress validating claims with independently verifiable operations and community-driven insights appears a prudent next step before confident recommendation could follow in good judgement and conscience. Transparency eliminates uncertainty, and uncertainty necessitates prudence above all else where one’s livelihood may be concerned.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.