is legit or scam? Reviews & complains 2024

Is Legit or a Scam? A Comprehensive Analysis presents itself as a sugar dating website that connects “sugar babies” with wealthy “sugar daddies” or “sugar mommas”. However, upon taking a closer look, there are some red flags that suggest the website may not be on the up and up. In this blog post, I will thoroughly analyze various aspects of to determine whether it can be trusted or if it is a potential scam site.

Domain Details and History

Let’s start by taking a look at some basic details about the domain itself. was registered on February 4, 2019, which means it is a relatively new domain at just over 3 years old. The website does not list any contact information or addresses for the owners/operators. This lack of transparency is the first red flag.

Legitimate businesses usually provide clear contact details to build trust with customers. Additionally, searching for reviews or discussions online provided very little information. This low online profile after 3 years of being live suggests may not be a large or reputable operation. New domains, especially those operating in the sugar dating niche, need to establish trust and credibility over time.

Website Design and Content

Upon visiting the homepage, the design of seems basic but functional. There are profiles displayed of alleged “sugar babies” seeking arrangements. However, taking a closer look reveals that many of the photos used are stock images that can be found elsewhere online. This is a major red flag, as using fake or stolen photos undermines the authenticity of the entire website.

Scam sites often use stolen stock images rather than real user photos to make their offerings seem more appealing and entice visitors to join or spend money. The about and FAQ sections are also fairly vague, lacking important details one would expect from a reputable sugar dating service. For example, there is no clear explanation of user verification processes, payment structures, or policies regarding safety and consent between members.

Read more on zazzle reviews and complains 2023; is zazzle legit or scam?

freezeframe reviews In Australia 2023; wrinkle block review

Is superace88 legit or scam Cassio? Reviews and complains 2023

Is Datongitshop Com Legit or Scam? Reviews & complains 2023

Trust and Safety Checks

Moving beyond just website analysis, there are some important trust and safety checks we can perform:

WOT Trust Rating – Web of Trust is a browser extension that allows users to rate websites. Unfortunately, does not have an established trust rating on WOT yet due to its low profile. The lack of user reviews and feedback is concerning.

Domain Blocklists – Checking various malware and phishing blocklists showed that has thankfully not been blacklisted by any major providers. However, a legitimate site would be expected to have a clean bill of health after 3+ years.

HTTPS Implementation – HTTPS (SSL certificate) is implemented on, which is good for security. However, it’s now an incredibly basic standard that even scam sites strive to meet.

Website Traffic – Alexa rankings showed the site has extremely low or no traffic at all globally. Legitimate sugar dating platforms get thousands of monthly visitors minimum. Low engagement raises suspicion.

Domain Email – While an HTTPS certificate and domain name were configured properly, curiously lacks a custom email address matching its domain. This suggests it may not be a fully professional operation.

In summary, while passes some basic security checks, the lack of traffic, user reviews or legitimate profile content, as well as the domain details, present an underwhelming trust profile that demands further scrutiny.

Validating Website Claims

Moving forward, let’s evaluate some specific claims made on

Site Purpose – The website markets itself as a sugar daddy dating platform, but there seems to be no verification of users’ identities, incomes, arrangements, or anything to ensure the site is used safely and appropriately. Without user validation, anyone could create fake profiles for nefarious purposes.

Payment Services – claims to offer premium memberships, but clicking around reveals no clear payment options or prices listed anywhere. Legitimate platforms openly display this information to build trust prior to transactions.

Contact Support – The website support page is blank without any listed phone numbers, emails or live chat support for users to get assistance. A reputable service ensures staff are available to address member concerns.

User Profiles – As mentioned before, reverse image searches revealed the majority of “sugar baby” photos used on profiles are stolen stock images, not real user uploaded content. Fake profiles undermine the core product offering.

Offline Fact Checking

To investigate further, some offline documentation was examined:

  • Business Registration – Public records search found no business registration or tax identification for owners. Omitting legal docs raises compliance questions.

  • Physical Address – The website address is listed as a generic virtual office mailing address, not a real administrative location. This provides no legitimacy.

  • Social Media Presence – While claims an active community, searches found no significant following across official Facebook, Twitter, YouTube or other major platforms. Legit sites market through multiple channels.

  • Media Mentions – A thorough online search also yielded no credible news stories, press releases or third party reviews mentioning specifically. Legitimate companies seek positive earned media coverage.

So in summary, provided no verifiable paper trail typically expected of an incorporated business. The lack of offline validation further damages trust in its purported operations.

Putting the Pieces Together

After an in-depth analysis of key on-page and off-page factors, several notable issues have emerged regarding that cause concern:

  • New domain age with no established online reputation
  • Website uses fake/stolen profile images not real user content
  • Lacks basic contact details and transparency about processes
  • Has no traffic or reviews from users on safety forums
  • Fails to address privacy/consent policies properly for sensitive service
  • Provides no proof of payment systems or premium membership options
  • Verification of identities, arrangements or documentation is nonexistent
  • No official business registration or tax identity for owners found
  • Physical address ties to virtual mailbox not administration office
  • No meaningful following or third party coverage on social/news outlets

The overwhelming consensus is that exhibits too many red flags aligned with common scam site behaviors rather than reputable legitimate businesses. From the questionable domain details and lack of user reviews, to fake profiles and unclear payment systems, many alarm bells ring that undermine trust.

While some rudimentary website functionality and security basics are handled properly, the complete lack of real offline validation or substance raises serious doubts about the integrity and intentions of’s actual operators. One must reasonably conclude it is not a site that honest internet users should trust, engage with or potentially hand over private/financial details to.

Final Verdict

After comprehensive multi-dimensional testing and research into across technical measures as well as offline documentation checks, the evidence strongly suggests this website should be considered a dubious potential scam and best avoided.

Too many inconsistencies and unanswered legitimacy questions remain. Reputable sugar dating platforms establish trust and build an audience over many years through active community engagement and by demonstrating real-world validity – none of which has been able to accomplish so far despite its age.

Unless significant positive changes are made and proper verification provided, prudent netizens are advised to steer clear of this site and instead choose sugar arrangements through established companies with verified track records after individual vetting too. An abundance of caution is merited when personal safety and financial well-being could be at risk online. In summary – proceed at your own risk.

This concludes my assessment of I hope this detailed analysis has been valuable in helping determine the legitimacy and trustworthiness of this website based on various technical, structural and legal validation factors considered. Please let me know if you have any other questions!

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.